首页> 外文OA文献 >Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanized public debates
【2h】

Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanized public debates

机译:谁居住在欧洲公共领域?在欧洲公开辩论中的胜利者和失败者,支持者和反对者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

European integration shifts the distribution of political opportunities to influence public debates, improving the relative influence of some collective actors, and weakening that of others. This article investigates which actors profit from and which actors stand to lose from the Europeanisation of political communication in mass-mediated public spheres. Furthermore, it asks to what extent these effects of Europeanisation can help one to understand collective actors' evaluation of European institutions and the integration process. Data is analysed on some 20,000 political claims by a variety of collective actors, drawn from 28 newspapers in seven European countries in the period 1990-2002, across seven different issue fields with varying degrees of EU policy-making power. The results show that government and executive actors are by far the most important beneficiaries of the Europeanisation of public debates compared to legislative and party actors, and even more so compared to civil society actors, who are extremely weakly represented in Europeanised public debates. The stronger is the type of Europeanisation that is considered, the stronger are these biases. For most actors, a close correspondence is found between how Europeanisation affects their influence in the public debate, on the one hand, and their public support for, or opposition to, European institutions and the integration process, on the other. © 2007 The Author(s); Journal compilation © 2007 (European Consortium for Political Research).
机译:欧洲一体化改变了政治机会的分布,以影响公众辩论,改善某些集体行为者的相对影响,并削弱其他集体行为者的影响。本文研究了大众参与的公共领域中,哪些参与者从政治传播的欧洲化中受益,哪些参与者会遭受损失。此外,它询问欧洲化的这些影响在多大程度上可以帮助人们理解集体行动者对欧洲制度和一体化进程的评价。分析了1990年至2002年期间来自七个欧洲国家的28家报纸,来自七个不同发行领域,具有不同程度的欧盟决策权的各种集体行动者大约20,000种政治主张的数据。结果表明,与立法和党派参与者相比,政府和行政行为者迄今为止是欧洲公共辩论最重要的受益者,与民间社会参与者相比,政府和行政行为者更为重要,后者在欧洲化公共辩论中的代表极为薄弱。所考虑的欧洲化类型越强,这些偏见就越强。对于大多数参与者而言,一方面欧洲化如何影响他们在公开辩论中的影响,另一方面又是公众对欧洲机构和一体化进程的支持或反对之间有着密切的联系。 ©2007作者;期刊编辑©2007(欧洲政治研究联盟)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Koopmans, R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号